The CJD Receiver Part-2
|
My initial attempt at
getting my CJD Receiver to work ran into trouble.
You can read
about this here.
|
Below are links to the sections
of the CJD receiver documentation that I have. These are incomplete
but hopefully will prove adequate for my purposes (like having
a jigsaw with half the parts missing). One reason for adding
these is I will be able to access them on my workshop computer.
First section of the CJD
manual, pages 1 to 32, |
BR2407-1 |
Part 1 Ch1 to 4 + Part
2 Ch1 |
Second section of the
CJD manual, pages 33 to 43 |
BR2407-3 |
Part 1 Ch5 |
Third section of the CJD manual,
pages 44 to 97 |
BR2407-2 |
Part 2 Ch2 to 5 |
Fourth section of the
CJD manual, pages 98 to 123 |
BR2407-4 |
Diagrams + circuits |
BFO |
BR2407-6 |
Circuit |
Power supply rectifiers
& regulators |
BR2407-8 |
Circuit board |
Power supply mains &
transformer |
BR2407-9 |
Mains input |
Power supply sub-assembly |
BR2307-10 |
Mains input + other parts
less pcb |
2nd RF/1st Mixer/2nd Mixer/Local
oscillator |
BR2407-11 |
Centre of front end simplified
circuit |
Synthesiser sub-assembly |
BR2407-13 |
Block diagram |
Harmonic frequency selector |
BR2407-14 |
Part circuit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The choice of chassis for my
power supply and receiver detector and audio sections proved
to be too small, leading to overcrowding of circuitry and difficulties
of testing etc. The new design will be made using available materials
and past experience of constructing power supplies. Because a
lot of the exercise may include changes then the design will
need to allow flexibility for changing components and wiring
modifications. For example, although my previous plan was to
use an LM373 chip but there
may be an easier solution using an existing commercial circuit
board suitably modified to match the requirements of this receiver.
First the new chassis.... I
can think of a couple of contenders. A wooden baseboard with
a metal front panel or a traditional metal chassis using formed
steel sheet. One of the main drivers affecting the choice is
the electrical interface between the receiver and chassis which
is a multi-way cable carrying power and RF and control signals
pictured below. A simple solution is to provide an aperture in
the PSU baseboard through which the receiver multi-way connector
can be passed. Another driver is the method of bringing together
the PSU and the receiver and of course the ease I can make changes
and finally of course the choice of materials to hand. |
|
|
The original PSU was far
too cramped at 8 x 11 inches so fitting a wooden baseboard roughly
15 x 18 inches minus a cable aperture say 2 x 2 inches gives
me an improvement of better than three times. 266 compared with
88 square inches.
Material 20mm chipboard.
The steel front panel will be
matched in width to the CJD front panel.
Leaving an open cable aperture
will allow the PSU to be moved away giving access to the top
of the receiver chassis.
I might add a sheet of steel
onto the baseboard. |
|
|
Using available materials
this base will form the foundation for the new power supply and
detection circuitry.
As a test meter is already present
on the receiver front panel not much if anything will need to
be fitted to the front panel here.
Overall height is around 4.5
inches. |
|
|
Here's the progress so
far. Slightly more complicated than the original design because
I've included a test feature which enables one to check the various
voltages before turning on the receiver.
Using a wooden baseboard makes
it a simple matter to rearrange things and add the odd terminal
strip. |
|
What I'm attempting to do in summary
is to duplicate the mains power supply comprising a transformer
with various voltage regulation circuits (mounted on a printed
circuit board) plus a couple of other circuit boards carrying
the radio detector circuitry and audio processing circuitry ("radio
parts" in the sketch above). These all interface with the
main radio chassis via a multi-way connector.
As most restorers will not have
all the appropriate CJD documentation and those that have limited
information, as I did, find it a bit confusing I'll add useful
information as I discover it. For example the complete receiver
uses a chassis mounted above it carrying not only the complicated
power supply, but a couple of important receiver sections. These
are located on two printed circuit boards with a third board
carring smaller power supply components. To identify these I've
added the final four digits of their NATO codes.
4933= power supply parts, 4934=
the audio amplifier parts and 4935 IF amplifier/detector/AGC
parts.
Heavy PSU parts are coded 5136
To see how the radio parts fit
into the overall circuitry see the picture below. The section
in the lower part of the drawing shows the final audio amplifier
and loudspeaker plus jack socket located in the main receiver
chassis whilst the areas to the left and right are located on
circuit boards named "Equaliser gain panel" and "Audio
amplifier panel" respectively. |
|
|
Below is the Equaliser
gain panel circuit |
|
Below is the Audio amplifier
panel |
|
My plan is to replicate the
functions of the two panels using an LM383 device.
My other task is to figure out
why the meter is open circuit (ie find out why a high voltage
was present in one position) plus to work out why the PSU got
extremely hot and smoked after a couple of tries of connecting
it up. Below is a table giving the receivers power requirements.
Voltage |
Current |
Notes |
6.3VAC |
1.5A |
Valve heaters |
20V stabilised |
150mA |
Transistor power |
24V unsmoothed |
200mA |
Dial lamps |
22V smooth |
200mA |
Relay power |
minus 43V |
80mA |
AGC |
minus 55V |
1.18A |
Oven power etc |
150V |
15mA |
Valve local oscillator |
235V |
80mA |
Valve HT |
|
Before
proceeding I'll just show you an article from 1972 regarding
the LM373 which is the device I'm planning to use for the detector
circuits (re-my previous page on this) Just click here to see
the article published in CQ Magazine over 50 years ago.
This device was being marketed
around the date of my example of the CJD receiver. I bought one
on Ebay three years ago and put it away for safekeeping. Fortunately
I've just found it after an hour or so.. in the first place I'd
looked in a jiffy bag containing connector parts kindly supplied
by Paul, G8GJA.
Here's the spec...
Repairing the meter circuit
I decided to fix the meter circuit.
When I first acquired the receiver the meter was damaged so maybe
that was the reason the receiver was scrapped? I found one of
the ranges had a relatively high voltage at the meter leads.
I managed to find a junk box replacement but first I need to
fix the fault. Circuit diagrams are incomplete so I measured
the resistance across the leads of each meter switch position.
See below.. the green/brown lead is infrequently grounded. When
current flow through a shunt is applicable grounding isn't common.
SETTING |
OVEN |
CAL |
LOCK |
RF LEVEL |
AF LEVEL |
SYN |
IF2 |
IF1 |
RF1 |
HT2 |
HT1 |
OHMS |
0.3 |
2.7M |
3.6M |
OPEN |
24K |
3.3 |
8.7 |
13.6 |
10.2K |
2.1K |
2.2K |
OHMS |
73K |
750K |
GND |
OPEN |
OPEN |
3.7K |
3.7K |
3.7K |
5M |
GND |
GND |
NOTE |
1R105 |
5R43 |
PLE15 PLA-J |
PLA21 9PLA-AA |
9PLA-N |
1R106 |
1R103 |
1R104 |
1R107 |
1R109 |
1R110 |
Many readings are taken across
meter shunts connected to the meter switch and, as the meter
isn't protected, a fault say in the multi-way connector circuit
can ruin it.
The open RF level is probably
fed via the unplugged muli-way connector.
Below are details taken from
the handbook. |
|
|
|
|
|
Before long I'll need
to gain access to the circuitry and on the topside you can see
a couple of screening panels. Under the left panel secured by
29 screws are the circuits for the IF amplifier and on the right,
secured by a mere three screws is the RF front end circuits with
their 3-gang tuning condenser. |
|
|
|
Above, a view of the receiver
front end with its valves.
On the right is a view of the
panel above the test meter.
From left to right, top
Resistors measuring 3.7M ??,
8.5, 1.5, 12.7 and 6.23K (R111)
and horizontal (R110) 2.18K
Bottom,
Resistors 10.2K and 2.07K, a
diode then 10.09K, 15, 10.21K
and coil 0.1 ohm |
|
|
Now, upended to remove
covers on the underside... |
|
|
Above left, the trimmers
for the various tuning ranges and on the right, under the cover
is a piece of fibre board insulation material.
Removing this reveals another
metal panel and a worrying feature... only a single securing
crew. In fact during the dismantling I'd noticed about 50% of
the washers were missing and also of four large securing screws
for the valved front end, none are tight. Three seem cross-threaded
with one bent. I'm not the first to be investigating this receiver. |
|
Finally (left), under
the cover at the base of this module you can see three printed
circuit board sockets and, on the right a view under the last
cover. Click to see a larger picture. |
|
|
Now I'm going to investigate
the problem I'd had with the power supply overheating which,
at the time, I'd reckoned it was due to a fault in the oven circuit.
One slim possibility is incorrect
wiring between the PSU and the multi-way connector as the pin
numbering is extremely odd as you can see here.
Measuring the resistance between
each plug pin and ground revealed that many were high resistance
and others much as expected.
I've listed the results in the
tables below after the summary of pin allocations.
The final and most important
step is to confirm the wiring is correct. All the taboard colours
matched OK, but I'd unsoldered the wire from the HT connection
to the plug.
Thankfully there were no errors.
The unsoldered HT lead must
have been due to a leaky HT feed? |
|
|
PIN |
FUNCTION |
NOTE |
OHMS |
B |
Mains on/off |
Mains N |
HIGH |
F |
6.3VAC |
- |
0 |
L |
AGC long/short |
Long=+24V |
HIGH |
R |
minus 55V |
- |
34K |
V |
BFO on/off |
On=ground |
0 |
Z |
Screen |
For Pin U |
30 |
DD |
Ground |
- |
0 |
JJ |
Ground |
- |
HIGH |
NN |
Spare |
- |
HIGH |
|
PIN |
FUNCTION |
NOTE |
OHMS |
D |
Fuse F1 |
from Pin B |
HIGH |
J |
Rx Ready |
Relay ON=0 |
HIGH |
N |
600 ohm o/p |
- |
HIGH |
T |
Audio out |
Audio for 600 ohm |
HIGH |
X |
+235V |
- |
400K |
BB |
minus 43V |
- |
73K |
FF |
+150V |
- |
107 |
LL |
Ground |
- |
0 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
PIN |
FUNCTION |
NOTE |
OHMS |
A |
Mains on/off |
Mains L |
HIGH |
E |
6.3VAC |
- |
1.0 |
K |
+24V rough |
Lamps |
30 |
P |
600 ohm o/p |
- |
HIGH |
U |
Audio for CJD speaker |
End of pot |
HIGH |
Y |
Screen |
For Pin T |
HIGH |
CC |
+24V smooth |
- |
227 |
HH |
Ground |
- |
0 |
MM |
AGC1 |
- |
HIGH |
|
PIN |
FUNCTION |
NOTE |
OHMS |
C |
Fuse F2 |
from Pin A |
HIGH |
H |
+24V var |
Lamp dim |
HIGH |
M |
AGC on/off |
Off=+24V |
HIGH |
S |
+20V |
- |
3.6K |
W |
+20V |
- |
3.6K |
AA |
RF level |
To meter |
HIGH |
EE |
AGC3 |
AGC to RF |
HIGH |
KK |
AGC2 |
- |
HIGH |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
The next step is to power
the HT line with a variable supply then, after checking for odd
current, power the valve heaters and see if the extra HT current
draw is sensible, something I should have done before plugging
in the custom supply. In fact I can even monitor the IF output
and see if that is present.
All went well initially. HT
current less the valve heater current with the voltage measured
at 237volts was only 0.5mA which I hope suggests the HT condensers
are in good order. Adding the heater voltage of 6.3 volts AC
resulted in a current draw of 9mA at 240 volts. The 150 volt
draw was 1.5mA with the valve heaters warmed up and correctly
drawing 1.4 Amps. Moving onto the oven circuit the current measured
1.6 Amps. Testing the 24 smooth circuit resulted in 30mA, the
24 volt rough drew 32mA and the 24 variable input drew nothing.
The 20 volt circuit drew 20mA and at this point I realised I'd
applied not neg 55 volts but plus 55 volts to the oven circuit.
My only reference to this circuitry is a half page drawing showing
the neg 55 volt input going nowhere as the other half of the
circuit diagram is missing. I now need to check if I've damaged
something in the oven control area.
Oddly, none of the measurements
I made, either resistance or current draw, explain the overheating
transformer and smoke when I tested the power supply 18 months
previously. |
This is the new improved
design for the power supply and includes several switches which
are not used in a normal operating environment for the receiver.
One reason is I do not like
the idea of running AC mains through the umblical cable so the
on/off switch on the front panel of the receiver carries current
through a 24 volt relay coil. In my first design the PSO ON relay
had a DC coil which meant that the transformer T3 needed a rectifier
and capacitor.
To operate the receiver the
Standby switch is turned ON followed by the CJD ON/OFF switch.
The other switch (T1/T2) which I've called the Test switch is
inhibited via S2. That means operating the Test switch with the
Standby switch set to OFF will not turn on the three power supply
transformers.
This means that the various
PSU voltages can be checked (ideally)with the umbilical cable
unplugged by turning on the Test switch. I haven't added an interlock
to prevent the Test switch turning on the receiver PSU with the
umbilical cable plugged in. This could be done by adding another
relay but this adds yet more complication to the wiring. |
|
|
After modifying my new power supply
to use a 24AC relay (T3) and do away with the need for providing
24VDC, the only relay with a 24VAC coil I had turned out to be
faulty with an open circuit coil. I failed to find a suitable
alernative in my junk box so put back the rectifier and smoothing
capacitor after finding a nice 12VDC relay with decent terminals.
Next I tested this and it worked fine but I'd made a mistake
in the mains wiring so the connections to the pair of switches
(Test and Standby) need to be sorted out. Not too difficult as
I'd omitted a wire from T2 to the live side of the transformers.
Now the transformers powered up I checked the HT. This was unloaded
and sitting at 350 volts but adding a dummy load of 3.6Kohm reduced
this to 207 volts at 57mA. The reason for the steep drop was
the secondary circuit resistance. The choke resistance is marked
as 300 ohm and the HT secondary winding measured 230 ohms. I
should probably later remove the choke and fit a suitable resistor
so the output is at the level designed for the receiver. |
|
|
Next I checked the 24
volt circuit. This is using a different transformer than my first
circuit and it measured 24VAC. Switching on with the 24 volt
and 20 volt regulators connected at first resulted in a 24 volt
feed to the regulators however I hadn't yet fitted a reservoir
capacitor. I fitted a 2200uF capacitor and switched on. There
was a loud crack and the 7824 chip exploded. This was slightly
puzzling as the transformer output measured 24VAC RMS meaning
the maximum smoothed DC should be something like 35 volts and
the 7824 should be good for 40 volts so why did it explode? The
junk box surprisingly failed to yield a replacement so...
I decided to change the overall
design of the oven and 24 volt supplies. The new oven transformer
having twin 43 volt windings makes it easier to use full-wave
rectification which will result in a peak voltage of about 60
volts dropping under load. Previously I'd used a 2N3055 series
pass regulator (with a transformer having too high an output
for the job) and this I'll now use to regulate the 24 volt outputs. |
|
Despite my careful planning
things didn't turn out as I'd expected. Loading the neg 55 volt
supply with a handy 27 ohms reduced the rectified terminal voltage
to 43 volts and it was apparent that a 2N3055 regulator will
be required. A simple change might be to add a spare AC winding
to the 43 VAC transformer rather than wastefully use the pair
of 43 volt windings in series (=86 volts).
A suitable spare is a 5 volt
winding at the HT transformer. This would increase the output,
at first sight, to 48 volts but still not enough so using 86
volts may be the best bet as the transformer should be able to
supply the desired current. Wasted power will be (86V-55V) x
1.2A=37W. The other option is to locate a different transformer.
I wonder if a suitable filament lamp in series with the AC winding
would reduce the semiconductor losses? |
VOLTAGE |
235 |
150 |
-55 |
-43 |
24S |
24R |
24V |
20 |
6.3 |
TEST LOAD OHMS |
4700 |
10000 |
47 |
150* |
100 |
220 |
220 |
130 |
4.7 |
CURRENT mA |
50 |
15 |
1180 |
80* |
240 |
110 |
110 |
154 |
1340 |
* means the load/current is via the neg 55 volt supply
The table above is
constructed from the McMichael Radio Test Set parameters shown
here. |
|
I gave up on the twin 43 volt
transformer. Despite trying various schemes nothing provided
me with a sensible 55 volt output at full load so back to the
junk box. I collected several potential candidates and chose
one which supplied a 20-0-20 volts plus 15 volts with thick enough
copper to provide a couple of amps. The fun started when I came
to its mains tapping selector which gave options of 100/120/220
and 240 volt inputs. I cut off the selector and measured the
winding resistances. By trial and error I managed to put the
100 and 120 volt windings in series the wrong way round. The
incorrect phasing gave me 240 volts DC output at my test rectifier
bridge together with a loud hum and some smoke. Clearly the bad
phasing was giving me a step up from the expected 55 (x root
two) volts to 240 volts. I switched round one of the primary
windings and tried again. The output voltage at the capacitor
had fallen slightly and measured about 180 volts instead of 55
x root two volts. After puzzling and trying again the penny dropped.
The overcharged capacitor was stuck at 180 volts (cutting off
the rectifier diodes) and not discharging. I discharged the capacitor
and tried again. The voltage was now a slightly rising 74 volts.
This relates to (40+15) times root two minus a few volts at the
rectifier. My dummy load of 27 ohms got exceedingly hot with
the terminal voltage at a little over 58 volts... (= 2.1 amps)
perfect for the 2N3055 series pass regulator.. In fact the maximum
load will be 47 ohms so plenty of power will be available with
any surplus dissipated in the regulator.
Next... is the 24 volt supply
man enough? From the test results above I need no more than 700mA
and tests with a 27 ohm dummy load (=880mA) showed the outputs
were just about acceptable.
I've copied the potentially
useful information below from another page on my website. |
|
|
For interest I weighed
the twin 43 volt and its 20-0-20 volt +15 volt replacement. The
first was 1400 grams and the second 1930 grams. The table gives
their power ratings as about 56VA and 101VA respectively. My
tests drew circa 43V x 43V over 28.5 ohms = 65VA and 58V x 58V
over 28.5 ohms = 118VA respectively. These figures line up pretty
well with the table above once I'd measured the load plus its
leads.
I screwed down the new transformer
and connected up the remains of the regulator taken from the
(too small) chassis. This comprised the 2N3055 transistor fitted
to a heatsink plus a 1Kohm resistor and a pair of zener diodes
rated at 39 volts and 15 volts to give me 54 volts. The transistor
tested OK when I checked it with my multimeter but applying the
73 volts from the new transformer resulted in smoke and the pair
of zeners going short-circuit. I was puzzled once again. First
the 24 volt regulator failing for no reason and now my series
pass regulator failing as well. Were the zeners being over-run?
The current should be restricted to (73-54) volts over 1000 ohms
= 19mA. The zeners would dissipate 15 volts x 19mA = 285mW and
39volts x 19mA = 741mW and both were rated at 5W. I checked the
transistor again but realised the 1000 ohm resistor from base
to collector was giving me a false reading and sure enough, removing
this showed the 2N3055 base connection was open circuit. I fitted
a new transistor and a pair of 27 volt zeners and the regulator
worked perfectly supplying 54 volts. All I can think is I'd inadvertently
connected the zeners back-to-front. This would result in a current
of 73 volts over 1000 ohms = 73mA. But that would be 2.8W dissipation
at the 39 volt zener and surely not enough to render the pair
of zeners short-circuit? I'm still puzzled.... but at least I
now have the oven supply. I just need to add the extra zener
to the output to produce my 43 volt supply. I'm not going to
bother reducing the heat losses under no-load conditions as in
the original circuit. |
Below, the original simplified
circuit of the 55 volt oven supply and then with the Darlington
transistor. |
|
Testing the new circuit
under load I realised the original designers had indeed needed
to overcome the problem of the oven voltage load. As the load
current increases the 2N3055 base current increases thus reducing
the zener voltage to a point where the load voltage drops below
the required 55 volts. In fact there's a balance needed to be
achieved taking worst case figures for zener dissipation and
load current. In fact this was very similar to the first exercise
I'd had to deal with when I'd started in industry although dealing
with germanium transistors. The design associated with turning
solid state switches on and off needed a lot of manipulation
of my slide rule. A simple solution is to use a Darlington transistor
which has a larger current gain than a 2N3055 (gain = 20 to 70).
I selected a BD651 (gain = 750) and this worked fine with the
zener supply voltage constant under load and the output remaining
relatively steady with a dummy load of 47 ohms.
Below... progress so far. Note
the array of LEDs on the front panel. One for each of the supply
voltages plus test! |
|
|
|
The next step is to protect
the various AC mains connections with plastic covers before these
are accidentally touched. The wooden baseboard lends itself to
making additions such as this as well as moving things around
to make best use of space. Note at the bottom of the picture
my ceramic tipped heatproof tweezers which are perfect for holding
wires as they're soldered.
I wired up a set of LEDs along
the front panel. There are quite a lot of power supply voltages
required to run the receiver and I needed to fit no less than
nine LEDs for these plus one to indicate a TEST mode. The receiver
has its own on/off switch which was designed to turn on and off
the vessel's mains supply which I rejected this as being a little
unsafe. Rather than running 240 volts AC through the umbilical
cable I'd fitted a standby transformer which swapped the 240
volt connections for a low voltage supply used to turn on a 12-volt
relay. The relay in turn switches on all the mains transformers
in the power supply. The TEST switch turns the low voltage transformer
on or off. When in the OFF setting it readies the mains on/off
switch on the receiver front panel. TEST ON opens the low voltage
transformer mains input and TEST OFF turns on the low voltage
transformer. TEST OFF illuminates the blue LED on the front panel.
At this point I connected together
the ground connections of the various supply voltages. |
|
|
Now that the power
supply is basically ready I need to fully integrate the new design
for the detector circuitry.
For example I'll need to drill
the PSU front panel for some extra controls.
In the original published design
on which I plan to base my own there are several controls viz.
a switch for selecting AM or CW/SSB, master IF and audio gain
controls, an auto/manual AGC switch. and a BFO tuning control.
Looking at the picture above you can see several similar controls,
and its worth pointing out that the PSU box for the CJD receiver
has no front panel user adjustable controls. However, the CJD
receiver has a number of controls whose connections are carried
via the umbilical cable. To make the new design fully testable
though I might need to add a TEST feature which allows these
remote connections to be duplicated. I'll also need to add a
regulator or two to provide working voltages for the new IF circuitry.
Below
is an overview of the LM373. Click to see the full spec. |
|
|
|
|
Above.. BFO ON/OFF is
carried by Pin V with ground = ON. This implies that without
a ground connection (BFO=OFF) AM is received. In the CJD detector
this signal (ground) selects either the product detector or the
AM detector via a pair of 24 volt relays. This method will be
used in the redeigned detector but will require a TEST switch
to operate the relays.See drawing below |
|
Above the CJD 600 ohm
broadcast level and the AGC selector switch used to operate a
pair of relays in the external detector circuitry in the PSU
box. |
|
|
Control signals and audio
in and out of the detector circuits in the PSU box are carried
via the 34-way umbilical cable but RF is carried via coax cables.
These latter are the IF output from the CJD receiver plus the
BFO signal.
The BFO RF connection shown
here on the right is carried from the CJD receiver.
The IF signal here however comes
from the IF/AGC amplifier circuit shown below.
A detailed diagram of this area
is shown below. |
|
|
|
Above, switching is again
carried out via relays operated from CJD front panel knobs via
the umbilical cable. |
|
Below is the way the receiver
audio is controlled. There are two circuits provided. One is
direct to the CJD internal loudspeaker and the other for on-board
ship broadcasting. |
|
|
First pass at the LM373
circuit for the CJD receiver. Note that S1 and S2 are changeover
relays driven by the CJD receiver controls via the umbilical
cable.
You'll note the component marked
"Filter" which is used to define the bandpass of the
detector. In the published circuit this is a CFS455J which has
an input/output impedance of 2000 ohms.
As the incoming IF signal is
already well defined by the main receiver as shown below the
LM373 filter probably isn't too important, however I did check
on one of the Net calculators to see how easy it might be to
add a half decent filter.. |
|
|
On the right is a 3rd
Order filter and then a 4th Order more complex design.
Below is the shape using a single
coil and capacitor which is my preferred option for initial testing,
because I can readily find the parts. |
|
|
|
|
Building the RF detector
will be quite an easy task as I intend to use my favourite method
of construction. This needs a flat piece of of tinplate onto
which will be soldered the parts (the LM373, 12 volt regulator
and audio amplifier together with suitable relays). Before building
an experimental circuit I looked for and found a
more comprehensive datasheet. Click to see this.
Below, I've shown the two layouts
(AM plus CW/SSB) |
|
Looking at the published
AM circuit from K4DHC it seems he used the recommended component
values as depicted here and omitting the optional AGC theshold
adjustment. |
|
|
Again, looking at the
published CW/SSB circuit from K4DHC it seems he also used the
recommended component values as depicted here and omitting the
optional local oscillator and signal nulling adjustments.
Missed is the 50nF tone correction
capacitor at the audio output which might well be omitted to
boost HF audio components for older constructors.
I need to interface the circuit
more precisely to the CJD BFO output by adding an attenuator
reducing the input from 700mV to around 25mV.
I might have to also deal with
the IF signal amplitude from the CJD which is here shown as being
terminated by 50 ohms. |
|
|
One aspect I've glossed
over is the design of the AGC system within the CJD receiver.
The LM373 has an integral AGC circuit whose operation is predefined.
In order to send an AGC signal back to the CJD circuits I'll
need to emulate the circuitry in the original design. This needs
to be able to handle the LONG/SHORT and ON/OFF signals at the
umbilical cable and generate the AGC 1/2/3 outputs fed back.
A relay is fitted for AUTO/MANUAL AGC. Another relay is probably
going to be needed for handling LONG/SHORT.
Looking again at the AGC section
of the LM373 and the practical aspects of the CJD receiver there's
a problem. Traditionally in a communications receiver AGC is
produced by rectifying the RF level at the tail end of the IF
amplifier and indeed the CJD circuitry housed in the PSU does
this. The LM373 however has a different method which relies not
on the RF level, but the audio output. From my experience of
signals in the VLF range audio may not be a suitable parameter
on which to base AGC.
Looking at the drawings above,
Pin 1 is the point at which the gain of the LM373 is governed.
Its done by applying a filtered average voltage proportional
to the audio output, although as you can see, in both circuits
the AGC can be modified either by switching in a pot to apply
a DC voltage to Pin 1 for CW/SSB or adding a pot to modify the
audio-derived voltage from (almost) full to completely off.
One way to handle the CJD requirement
is to merely add a standard diode detector to rectify the 21.5KHz
IF signal and use this to operate on Pin 1, maybe adding the
facility to select either this or audio-derived AGC. In fact,
it's then a straightforward matter to derive the required CJD
inputs of RF Level (AA) and AGC 1/2/3 (MM/KK/EE).
The drawing below shows the
IF stages and the AGC path. A potential source for the RF signal
for the above solution is either Pin 9 or Pin 4 and would avoid
adding a separate amplification stage sharing Pin 2.
See the drawing showing the
section of the original CJD circuitry below the LM373 picture. |
|
|
This drawing is a bit
blurry but Diode D1 is the classical envelope RF detector (driven
from the LM373 and the required signals mentioned above are shown.
A relay, driven from Pin L,
is used to select Long/Short AGC with Long set with its 24 volt
coil active.
A second relay is used to turn
off the AGC at VT8 with its active state being OFF
I can imagine the end result
will need some experimentation to get it working as the original
designers' intended.
Note that this circuit uses
the neg 43 volt supply so that the AGC signals are negative with
respect to ground. The line marked "AGC Detector" is
merely the +20 volt DC supply.
Below, almost completed design |
|
|
|
COMPONENTS LISTS
R1 |
3.9K |
R7 |
1K |
R13 |
6.2K |
R19 |
33K |
R2 |
1K |
R8 |
47K |
R14 |
220 |
R20 |
12K |
R3 |
20K |
R9 |
47K |
R15 |
15K |
R21 |
3.3K |
R4 |
10K |
R10 |
1K |
R16 |
150K |
R22 |
15K |
R5 |
5.1K |
R11 |
470K |
R17 |
1M |
|
|
R6 |
27K |
R12 |
3.3K |
R18 |
2.2M |
|
|
C1 |
10uF |
C7 |
100nF |
C13 |
1uF |
VR1 |
10K |
C2 |
100nF |
C8 |
10nF |
C14 |
100nF |
VR2 |
5K |
C3 |
25uF |
C9 |
100nF |
C15 |
100nF |
VR3 |
100K |
C4 |
10uF |
C10 |
30nF |
C16 |
100nF |
|
|
C5 |
1uF |
C11 |
10nF |
C17 |
100nF |
|
|
C6 |
10nF |
C12 |
22uF |
|
|
|
|
|
Now that I had enough
detail to start building the above circuit I constructed what
you see below. The 600 ohm amplifier isn't needed (except for
completeness of the overall system) so that can be left until
later. The audio output level from the LM373 is defined as 120mV
so I might need to deal with this once testing gets underway
as I'm unsure of the CJD requirement. Also, I might need a 21.5KHz
tuned circuit at the input to the LM373 and perhaps a better
bandpass fillter for best operation.
I counted a total of 22 fixed
resistors, 3 pots and 17 capacitors plus maybe a few more as
the style of construction uses capacitors as component anchor
points (eg. C14-17). In addition I need to construct the 21.5KHz
bandpass filter.
Below... the detector
assembly almost complete. Power requirements are neg 43 volts
and 20 volts with an on-board 12 volt regulator for the LM373
device. The coil, using a core from a scrap flat screen TV pcb,
is rewound to give 1.8mH on my latest Chinese component meter,
and the 33nF tuning capacitor marked selected for 30nF so I can
add extra capacitance to centre the response. I used 2.2K resistors
to provide a similar impedance to the filter specified in published
circuits. |
The picture below that of the
detector shows the PSU with the detector roughly in position. |
|
|
|
Above... general view of the PSU
not far from complete and waiting for the detector assembly
I suppose the next step is to
test the detector circuit to prove its operation. I plan to do
this with a pair of bench power supplies and my spectrum analyser
to confirm the thing is resonant at 21.5KHz then a pair of signal
generators to check AM and CW/SSB performance. In fact that idea
wasn't exactly straightforward because many signal generators
do not go down to 23.5KHz. Fortunately, once I'd checked my TinySA
did this comfortably and allowed a sensible modulation frequency.
Looking at its spec however revealed it was supposed to go down
to 0.1MHz so I'll need to confirm the indicated frequency really
does get generated!! |
|
|
|
Panic stations
I connected up a power supply
and an oscilloscope and my TinySA to no avail. Firstly the connection
to the TinySA was intermittent so I swapped the BNC cable.. still
intermittent and I suspect its a solder joint in the TinySC.
However the main problem was nothing at all from the LM373. I
modified the filter by inserting a couple of 100nF series capacitors
as the filter was grounding pins 4 and 9. Still nothing from
the LM373.. was it a bad one? Maybe my relay was wrongly wired?
But no, a check revealed all was well. Before abandoning the
LM373 I looked at the K4DHC design and spotted a drawing showing
the lead opposite the tab on the 10-pin chip was marked "1"
but the device spec appeared to show it was "10". After
a few more searches I realised I'd copied the published error..
oops. Have I wrecked the LM373? I rewired it and powered it up
and it now started producing signals but of course one of the
functions may now be damaged. In fact my scope did show odd results
but connecting headphones to C4 gave me a tone correcponding
to the modulation frequency. The proof will be to inject a BFO
signal and see if that produces a correct CW output. I'll be
using my reliable Black Star
audio signal generator as this has a 10:1 vernier tuning
control, works from 10Hz to 100KHz nicely covering the required
21.5KHz.
I've corrected the latest drawings
viz the LM373 connections.
Now to fix the TinySA. I opened
it up and pulled off a metal concealing the soldering to the
output socket. It was fine so put it back together and tried
the lead. The short length seemed to have a break which responded
to pressure so I'll ditch it and use a BNC lead with an appropriate
adaptor.
Success.. the LM373 seems to
be working properly except the output needed a 100nF capacitor
to ground to remove RF feedthrough but once in place I could
vary the signal generator around zero beat. I'm not sure about
the operation of the basic 21.5KHz bandpass filter with my simple
test configuration so might look at this later.
The various figures were noted
as follows. Maximum output at 21.5KHz input resulted from -12dBm
(circa 50mV RMS) across the 10K pot turned to max. The BFO input
was about 1 volt RMS and the audio output was enough for headphone
listening. The spec tells me this should be from 50 to 120mV
RMS. I've yet to check the AGC characteristics and the AGC circuitry
as I'll need a second bench PSU for the neg 43 volt supply.
Unfortunately it seems the LM373
is badly compromised as when I selected Manual Gain via the relay
I noticed the 12 volt supply drew up to an amp, the regulator
became exceedingly hot as did the LM373 itself. Before abandoning
this device and using the original circuits I'd like to see exactly
what's going on.
Very odd! There was a tiny solder
whisker across the supply decoupling capacitor that came and
went. I removed this and the excessive current disappeared and
I found AM and CW could be received. I'll need to move the next
stage of experimentation to my workshop so I can carry out better
testing and prove or disprove the LM373 performance.
One of the problems of testing
is the low IF of 21.5KHz which is well below the coverage of
most RF signal generators. I have several options. The TinySA
does produce low frequency signals but its outside its full
spec. My Marconi TF2008
works down, unbelievably to zero frequency but at 21.5KHz its
ease of tuning isn't ideal. I also used an audio signal generator
but as a BFO only because one can't modulate it. During testing
I found my Rigol DSA815TG
worked well at 21.5KHz.
I looked on Ebay for a suitable
signal generator and found nothing to fit the bill so I looked
on my own website in case I'd actually got something suitable
and was very surprised to find my Wavetek
2407 went down to 10KHz. I checked its spec in case I'd made
a mistake, but no it went down to 10KHz so it will be ideal because
it's extremely stable.. so cross fingers it works properly as
it has a history of going wrong.
Next, I'll look again at the
LM373 filter because when I tested this it had a very poor response.
Whether this is due to a matching problem, I'm not sure. I'm
using 330nF input and output coupling capacitors and these are
miles different in terms of impedance to the 2Kohm I was aiming
for at 21.5KHz. I think around 3.3nF might be better.
Sure enough, by replacing the
330nF (=22 ohms) input capacitor with 1nF (7Kohm) I managed to
get a filter response which produced a half-decent shape.
I fitted the filter to the circuit
and it retained its shape but became much less responsive. Note
that the coil is 1.8mH. |
|
Fig A
|
Fig B
|
|
Above at Fig A... the
response of the filter on the bench, detached from the circuit.
Above right Fig B... the filter
inserted into the circuit.
Right Fig C... a typical 21.5KHz
signal injected into the input along with the tracking generator
The true amplitude is only relative because I'm
using my home made probe to avoid loading the LM373, but
has a loss at this frequency of around 10dB
See the pictures later on
down the page.
I'm monitoring the signal at
the relativly high impedance Pin 9 of the LM373.
Output was via the grey 330nF
capacitor but this is now 1nF, and input from the tracking generator
via the green 2.2nF capacitor. The coil measured 1.81mH and the
black tuning capacitor 3nF. Result in Fig A above.
Below.. testing the simple filter.
The "T7" tester is used to measure the inductor and
capacitors. |
Fig C
|
|
|
When I looked at Fig A
and C above I realised that in CW mode the filter would be best
centred slightly lower in frequency as the BFO range of +/- 3KHz
is quite significant in the VLF range so I added by trial and
error (with the Wavetek set to 18.5 and 24.5KHz) an extra 1nF
capacitor across the tuning capacitor shifting the response leftwards.
Using AM I could hear a tone at the audio output but setting
the AGC relay didn't have much effect. |
|
This section is to prove my
probe is suitable for making low frequency measurements because,
as I see it, the receiver needs to provide relatively very wide
bandwidths at the IF of 21.5KHz. At 465KHz reception of
a broadcast signal would require a minimum of say 6KHz bandwidth
or 1.3%. At 21.5KHz I need to ensure 3KHz bandwidth or 14%.
It's been some time since I
tested my probe so decided to check it.
Centre frequency set to 21.5KHz
with each horizontal division 1KHz.
Tracking generator set to -20dBm
Right with the probe turned
off.
Below the probe turned on. Loss
= 10.38dB
Below right with its external
input series 390kohm resistor shorted out, loss = 9.11dB.
The 390Kohm resistor fitted
for HT protection accounts for only 1.27dB. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|